'Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for relative indication early gastric cancer in non-surgical candidates'.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is effective in treating early gastric cancer (EGC). It's role in the comorbid with more advanced disease is unknown. We sought to evaluate this in a large Western cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for EGC in a single tertiary Western endoscopy centre over 10 years were prospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were long term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) up to 5 years. Secondary outcomes were efficacy and serious adverse events (SAE). RESULTS: ESD for 157 EGC in 149 patients were performed in an elderly and comorbid cohort with mean age 73.7 years and age-adjusted Charleson Comorbidity Index 4.2. Over a median follow-up period of 51.6 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS (88.9% vs 77.9%, P = 0.290) and DFS (83.2% vs 75.1%, P = 0.593) between absolute indication (AI) EGC and relative indication (RI) EGC. AI EGC cohort achieved higher en bloc (96.3% vs 87.5%, P = 0.069) and R0 resection rate (93.6% vs 62.5%, P <0.001) when compared to RI EGC. There were no significant differences in SAE (7.3% vs 12.5%, P = 0.363). No mortality or surgical resection ensued from ESD complications. CONCLUSION: ESD safely confers DFS in poor surgical candidates with RI EGC in a large Western cohort. Patients who are elderly and comorbid or decline surgical resection may benefit from ESD and avoid the risks of surgery and its long-term sequelae.

Hybrid resection versus conventional resection for laterally spreading lesions of the papilla.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although conventional hot snare resection (CR) of laterally spreading lesions of the major papilla (LSL-Ps) is effective, it can be associated with delayed bleeding in upward of 25% of cases. Given the excellent safety profile of cold snare polypectomy in the colorectum, we investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel hybrid resection (HR) technique for LSL-P management, consisting of hot snare papillectomy plus cold snare resection of the laterally spreading component. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients underwent HR in a tertiary referral center over 60 months until December 2022. This cohort was compared with a historical cohort of patients who underwent CR at the same institution over 120 months until August 2017. The primary outcomes were recurrence and bleeding. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent HR (14 female; mean age 65.2 ± 12.2 years). Median lesion size was 30 mm (interquartile range, 25.0-47.5 mm). Recurrent or residual adenoma (RRA) was greater with HR (58.8% [n = 10] vs 29.8% [n = 14]; P = .034). The odds ratio for recurrence was 3.6 times (95% CI, 1.2-11.0) higher with HR (P = .027). RRA was multifocal in 4 (40%) and had a composite RRA volume >10 mm in 7 (70%). The median number of procedures required to treat RRA was higher with HR (4 vs 1, P = .002). There was no difference between CR and HR for intraprocedural bleeding (41.1% [n = 23] vs 25% [n = 5]; P = .587) or delayed bleeding (25.0% vs 10.0%, P = .211). There were no perforations. CONCLUSIONS: The novel HR technique for LSL-P management is associated with a high rate of RRA that is recalcitrant to treatment, without mitigating the risk of intraprocedural or delayed bleeding. Therefore, CR should remain the mainstay management option for treating patients with an LSL-P. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306603.).

Geometry of cold snare polypectomy and risk of incomplete resection.

BACKGROUND: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is safer than and equally efficacious as hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for the removal of small (<10mm) colorectal polyps. The maximum polyp size that can be effectively managed by piecemeal CSP (p-CSP) without an excessive burden of recurrence is unknown. METHODS: Resection error risks (RERs), defined as the estimated likelihood of incomplete removal of adenomatous tissue for a single snare resection pass, for CSP and HSP were calculated, based on an incomplete resection rate. Polyp area, snare size, estimated number of resections, and optimal resection defect area were modeled. Overall risk of incomplete resection (RIR) was defined as RIR=1 - (1 - p)n, where p is the RER and n the number of resections. RESULTS: A 40-mm polyp has a four times greater area than a 20-mm polyp (314.16mm2 vs. 1256.64mm2), and requires three times more resections (11 vs. 33, respectively, assuming 8-mm piecemeal resection pieces for p-CSP). RIRs for a 40-mm polyp by HSP and p-CSP were 15.1%-23% and 40.74%-60.60% respectively. CONCLUSION: RER is more important with p-CSP than with HSP. The number of resections, n, and consequently RIR increases with increasing polyp size. Given the overwhelming safety of CSP, specific techniques to minimize the RER should be studied and developed.

Endoscopic resection of large anastomotic polyps is safe and effective.

BACKGROUND: Large (≥20mm) adenomatous anastomotic polyps (LAAPs) are uncommon. Data pertaining to their prevalence, characteristics, and the efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) are absent. A safe and effective strategy for ER would reduce morbidity and healthcare costs. METHODS: Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of ≥20mm (LNPCPs) referred for ER were prospectively studied. Multiple data points were recorded including anastomotic location, polyp morphology, resection modality, complications, and technical success. RESULTS: Over 7 years until November 2022, 2629 lesions were referred. Of these, 10 (0.4%) were LAAPs (median size 35 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 30-40mm]). All LAAPs were removed by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), most (n=9; 90%) in combination with cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST). On comparison of the LAAP group with the conventional LNPCP group, CAST was more commonly used (90% vs. 9%; P<0.001) and deep mural injury (DMI) type II was more frequent (40% vs. 11%, P=0.003); however, significant DMI (III-V) did not occur. At 6 month (IQR 5.25-6 months) surveillance, there was no recurrence in any of the 10 cases. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: LAAPs present unique challenges owing to their location overlying an anastomosis. Despite these challenges they can be safely and effectively managed endoscopically without recurrence at endoscopic follow-up.

A novel tool for case selection in endoscopic mucosal resection training.

BACKGROUND: As endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥ 20 mm) adenomatous nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) becomes widely practiced outside expert centers, appropriate training is necessary to avoid failed resection and inappropriate surgical referral. No EMR-specific tool guides case selection for endoscopists learning EMR. This study aimed to develop an EMR case selection score (EMR-CSS) to identify potentially challenging lesions for "EMR-naïve" endoscopists developing competency. METHODS: Consecutive EMRs were recruited from a single center over 130 months. Lesion characteristics, intraprocedural data, and adverse events were recorded. Challenging lesions with intraprocedural bleeding (IPB), intraprocedural perforation (IPP), or unsuccessful resection were identified and predictive variables identified. Significant variables were used to form a numerical score and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to generate cutoff values. RESULTS: Of 1993 LNPCPs, 286 (14.4 %) were in challenging locations (anorectal junction, ileocecal valve, or appendiceal orifice), 368 (18.5 %) procedures were complicated by IPB and 77 (3.9 %) by IPP; 110 (5.5 %) procedures were unsuccessful. The composite end point of IPB, IPP, or unsuccessful EMR was present in 526 cases (26.4 %). Lesion size, challenging location, and sessile morphology were predictive of the composite outcome. A six-point score was generated with a cutoff value of 2 demonstrating 81 % sensitivity across the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The EMR-CSS is a novel case selection tool for conventional EMR training, which identifies a subset of adenomatous LNPCPs that can be successfully and safely attempted in early EMR training.

Cold snare EMR for the removal of large duodenal adenomas.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Large (≥15 mm) duodenal adenomas (DAs) are premalignant and require removal. Existing endoscopic resection techniques are compromised by serious adverse events (SAEs), most notably postprocedural bleeding (PPB) and perforation. To ameliorate these problems, we sought to evaluate the novel technique of cold snare EMR (CS-EMR) against the emerging standard of conventional EMR with thermal ablation of the postresection margin (EMR-T) for the safe and effective removal of DAs. METHODS: Consecutive patients were enrolled in a single tertiary center for CS-EMR and prospectively analyzed against a previously reported cohort of EMR-T from the same center. The primary outcome was rate of SAEs. Secondary outcomes were residual or recurrent adenoma at first surveillance endoscopy (SE1) at 6 months and technical success per lesion. RESULTS: Between October 2019 and July 2022, a total of 50 DAs ≥15 mm were removed via CS-EMR (median size, 30 mm [interquartile range (IQR), 19-40 mm]; mean ± standard deviation [SD] patient age, 70 ± 9.2 years) compared with 54 DAs via EMR-T (median size, 30 mm [IQR, 19-40 mm]; mean patient age, 68 ± 12.2 years). CS-EMR had a significantly lower rate of intraprocedural bleeding (2.0% vs 37%, P < .001) and PPB (4.0% vs 16.7%, P = .036). Two cases (4.0%) of immediate perforation occurred in CS-EMR; these were recognized immediately and closed with clips without sequelae. Total SAEs (16.0% vs 16.7%, P = 1) and technical success (100% vs 100%, P = 1) were identical. Recurrence at SE1 was significantly higher with CS-EMR (24.4% vs 2.3%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: CS-EMR reduces intraprocedural bleeding and PPB. However, it may increase the risk of immediate perforation and is associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrence at SE1. Further technical refinements are required to optimize endoscopic resection techniques for DAs. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306603.).

Histologic Remission (NANCY Index) is Superior to Endoscopic Mucosal Healing in Predicting Relapse Free Survival in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical and Endoscopic Remission.

BACKGROUND: Histologic activity is recognized as an important predictor of relapse in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Current treatment targets aim at mucosal healing; however, many patients continue to have histologic activity. GOALS: The aim was to assess histologic activity using the validated Nancy histologic index (NHI) score as a predictor of future relapse amongst UC patients in endoscopic and clinical remission. STUDY: In this retrospective cohort study, UC patients in clinical and endoscopic remission at a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018, who underwent a surveillance colonoscopy were included. Clinical remission was defined by partial Mayo score (MSp) <2, and endoscopic remission was defined by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≤1. Histologic remission was defined by NHI <2. Predictive factors associated with the primary endpoint of clinical relapse were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 74 of 184 UC patients were included in the study. Amongst this cohort, 33 patients (45%) demonstrated histologic activity (NHI >1) at enrollment. The median follow-up time was 42 months (interquartile range: 26 to 63 mo) with median relapse free period of 30 months (interquartile range: 18 to 48 mo). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated patients with MES 0 ( P =0.02) and histologic remission ( P <0.0001) had significantly longer relapse free survival. On multivariate analysis only histologic activity remained an independent risk factor of future clinical relapse (hazard ratio: 4.36, confidence interval: 1.68-11.27, P =0.002). CONCLUSION: Histologic remission using the NHI independently predicts significantly longer relapse free survival and may be a superior therapeutic target than endoscopic remission.

Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The risk of cancer in large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm (LNPCPs) in the rectum relative to the remainder of the colon is unknown. We aimed to describe differences between rectal and colonic LNPCPs to better inform treatment decisions. METHODS: Patients with LNPCPs referred to tertiary centers for endoscopic resection within a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort were evaluated. Data recorded were participant demographics, LNPCP location, morphology, resection modality, and histopathologic data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify those variables independently associated with rectal versus nonrectal location in the colon. RESULTS: Patients with LNPCPs referred for endoscopic resection between July 2008 and July 2021 were included. Rectal LNPCPs (n = 618) were larger (median size, 40 mm vs 30 mm; P < .001) and more likely to be granular (79% vs 50%, P < .001) with a nodular component (53% vs 17%, P < .001) compared with nonrectal LNPCPs (n = 2787). Rectal LNPCPs were more likely to have tubulovillous histopathology (72% vs 47%, P < .001) and contain cancer (15% vs 6%, P < .001). After adjusting for the other features independently associated with location, cancer was more common in the rectum compared with the colon (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.53). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that compared with LNPCPs in the rest of the colon, rectal LNPCPs are more likely to be larger and contain more advanced pathology. These findings have implications for curative endoscopic resection techniques particularly where early cancer is present. (Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT01368289 and NCT02000141.).